On May 9th in 1950 former French Prime Minister Robert Schuman issued the Schuman Declaration, calling upon the nations of Europe to come together economically whereby pooling their coal and steel production would make “any war between France and Germany not merely unthinkable, but materially impossible.” What came out of all this?
The birth of the present day European Union.
Perhaps it is too soon to say we can come together and call ourselves ‘Europeans’, placing our member state nationalities to a mere second place. Some individuals are comfortable taking that nationalistic leap, but in the midst of economic crises and austerity measures taking place on the member state and European level, it is hard to rally around ‘Europe’ at the present moment.
But nevertheless, the European project is a success in a peculiar, extraordinary way. Before turning a critical eye to the EU, let me first give credit where credit is due. The EU is not just an acronym that makes the majority scratch their heads and utter ‘huh?’ out of sheer confusion.
The European experiment has had successful results in two cases.
First – the unmistakable success of preventing war on the European continent. Schuman’s initial goal of preventing war between France and Germany has become a reality. While spats between the two still occur, it is nothing compared to the damage of the past. Today, a love affair between Sarkozy and Merkel (Merkozy) exists. Time will tell if this will hold true with the new French President Francois Hollande – maybe a Merkollande or Frangela will develop?
Second – the EU’s promotion of democracy and adherence to democratic principles. I think it is safe to say that any communication material issued by the EU has the word ‘democracy’ inserted somewhere. But it goes beyond just mere rhetoric. By making it part of the Copenhagen Criteria, a check-list for membership, the EU has made democracy part of its conditions for membership. A bold and worthwhile move, with tangible success resulting from its newest members in Central and Eastern Europe.
But, enough with the pat on the back – while well deserved – it does not address what the EU is lacking. It is far from perfect. Or truly functional most of the time.
With each birthday the EU should take a step back and reevaluate itself.
The EU, as it stands now, is a bureaucratic labyrinth trying to create policies that benefit Europeans, but at the same time is far removed from citizens. Some change is on the horizon with the European Citizens Initiative (ECI) coming to fruition. It will allow Europeans to launch petition-styled campaigns for initiatives they believe the EU should look into. It is a step in the right direction, but does it have the mechanisms behind it to garner real change?
Another aspect that needs to be addressed, or ideally, reformed, is the structure of the institutions. Too many individuals working within the institutions that have no bloody idea what they are doing or what is occurring in the other institutions. How many Heads of Units does one DG need? A friend writing her doctorate had an interview with a nameless Head of Unit at a nameless DG who told her he arrived at the position last year and had no knowledge of what his portfolio contained. Let the shock wash over you.
It’s no secret in Brussels that the three main institutions – European Commission, European Parliament and the Council on the European Union – do not look at each other favorably. Employees have no idea who their counterparts in other institutions are. Why should they? It wouldn’t make things run smoother. If the people within the institutions cannot figure out who to contact, how can regular citizens?
Bottom-line: everyone is too worried about keeping their precious salaries and benefits with too many holidays to count, rather than taking the necessary steps at creating a succinct and working system.
Yes, not all is perfect in this 27-member state political system experiment. To tackle all the issues would require a book, but it gives you an idea of the situation on the ground. But who would expect it to be perfect? With a constant battle between widening and deepening along with sovereignty versus pooled sovereignty debates, its not surprising the EU has all these issues.
The EU is still an infant compared to other political/economic systems. But there is a hope, within myself and many others, to see this experiment become more successful than it has been.
I do wish the European Union all the best, or as we say in Polish ‘Sto Lat’, in its next phase. Moreover, I wish the European Union further unity, common sense and unilateral organization in its future endeavors. Happy 62nd Birthday!
